Opensource Collaborative Juice Project

This online database allows you to tick the flavours you have, and find recipes.

website sometimes loads slow for me.

Flavors - e-Liquid Calculator

 

In the past I've been bored enough to find some strange ways of amusing myself, I have taken part in many package swaps, a lot of them can be projects that work in a round robin style, once off or monthly recurring ones. You sign up, get assigned a partner and the two of you swap, then next time you get a different partner and the two of you swap, something like that could work, just a matter of matching together people so people who dislike certain things (ie I don't dig tobaccos) don't get something they aren't going to appreciate

 

Awesome, thanks marty

 

I'm for this too, even from the other side of the planet For the test bottles, there are little 3ml, and I suppose other sizes, tubes with a clip on top attached that could be ideal, as they're cheap, leak proof, and a good size to get a reasonable taste of the juice. I'll try to google up an address in your part of the world, probably under lab supplies ??? Anyhow, I'll be back.
Hope you'll accept not-canuk vapers in the project.

 

Personally, I think a competition would be a better way to get recipes out there in the open.

Could even have it sponsored by a vendor.

"Master Vape". Contestants have a week to make their ejuice, and they are sent to community appointed judges. The Judges have to be well experienced with different kinds of atomizers, since the ejuicers will have to give recommendations about what type of atomizer their ejuice is best experienced on.

Contestants must give their recipes though.

 

That would be amusing. It would work better with a flavour theme, eg. Tobacco, Vanilla, Apple, Citrus, Mint etc.
Would be weird to have a custard go up against a lemon or a mint go up against a vanilla tobacco.

 

Keen on the idea, I think a registry of interest is one way to start. Set up categories and allocate those people interested in each to them. That might keep numbers down to a managable size for personal costs. Say groups of 5 on a two month cycle, a month to aquire the resources and prepare a 0 nic flavour, then a 3 week window to make, store then send, or 5 weeks prep. Last week, send and vape or send in week one of the 2nd month with a 2 week steep post mix, then a week of vape and review.

I think groups of five would be good, sending out 4 samples every two months. I also think recipes and names and types of mix should be witheld until after review to prevent any preconceptions about the vape. Reviews once posted are finished off with recipe and techique if they meet a peer review threshold of acceptance.

Of the whole group of registered creators a select few elected by peers define the boundaries of the sample, size, suspension liquid and any ingredient restrictions and minimum hygiene standards for preparation for health reasons. For example I would be vary wary of allowing home brew extractions, if your passing it around the ingredient should at least be a foodstuff that has come through some sort of quality control. Maybe another category could be for those willing to test Self Extracted Juices with a recipe prior to review.

Lastly review requirements, device minimums or information that must be included so that readers can make some further assumptions based on individual preferences. Palate cleansing techniques etc.

Vapor Device - RBA, Clearo, bottom fed etc
Mod/Battery - pro vari, GG, etc
Voltage used -
Resistance -
Coil Type Material- ribon, single, dual, twisted etc
Wicking Material - ceramic, 400 SS mesh, silica etc
Nic -
VG ratio -
PG ratio -

Review Feeback

Visual Looks -
Aroma pre-vape -
Taste on Inhale -
Taste on Exhale -
Throat Hit in context of Nic/PG/VG/Flavour ratio and PV used -
Vapour production in context of PG/VG/Flavour ratio and PV used -

Score -

Summary thoughts -

Post 4 reviews a recipe and weighted score with summary thoughts from the maker as to intent and overall satisfaction with result.